Search results
1 – 5 of 5
John L. Cotton, Bonnie S. O’Neill and Andrea E.C. Griffin
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the hypothesis that Whiteness is used as a normative standard when comparing a variety of first names.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the hypothesis that Whiteness is used as a normative standard when comparing a variety of first names.
Design/methodology/approach
Respondents (full- and part-time business students) evaluated names that sounded common, African-American, Russian, and unusual.
Findings
Results from two studies suggest that “common” or “neutral” names are perceived to be white, and to be more American than African-American, Russian or unusual-sounding names. Results also demonstrate that the common names have more positive attributes, including socio-economic class.
Research limitations/implications
The study found that the basic comparison of American respondents will be to a white person. Second, the authors applied Critical Race Theory (CRT) to the research on names. Finally, the authors demonstrate that unless they are totally anonymous, virtual teams will still have the type of social categorization and stereotyping of team members found in ordinary teams.
Practical implications
Organizations and managers need to recognize that a “colorblind” approach simply reinforces the expectation that any differences in American organizations will be compared against the Whiteness standard. This can be a problem in any organizational setting, especially given the proliferation of virtual teams. This may be addressed with attempts to increase common in-group identity and strategies for identifying bias.
Originality/value
In this research the authors integrate concepts and theory from Virtual Teams, CRT and the Psychology of Names, providing both theoretical and practical implications.
Details
Keywords
Outlook for the women, peace and security agenda.
Details
DOI: 10.1108/OXAN-DB242842
ISSN: 2633-304X
Keywords
Geographic
Topical
I DID NOT, in fact, spend the second half of May prone under a pastis barrel in South Brittany, as I forecast in the last issue, but only because the stuff does not, apparently…
Abstract
I DID NOT, in fact, spend the second half of May prone under a pastis barrel in South Brittany, as I forecast in the last issue, but only because the stuff does not, apparently, come in barrels, but in comfortable‐sized bottles, and very nice too! I can report that the weather was exactly what I had always believed to be the norm in late Spring (ie recent British November fare), that the French, who are pretty awful really, would like us to stay in the Common Market because, although they think we have gone mad, it is only thanks to Britain that nazism was broken, and that if you listen to BBC Radio 4's 6 o'clock news while sitting placidly in the sunshine of a Breton evening, you rapidly realise that the French are quite right, and that the British have gone stark raving mad. Try it!